It is demonstrated that while all these factors appear to affect the obtained results (with cluster frequency being the best predictor of the participants’ nonword acceptability decisions), other possible determinants of this phenomenon have to be studied as well. The experimental results were next examined from the perspective of three possible determinants of the participants’ acceptability judgements: the sonority profile of the clusters measured in terms of the Sonority Sequencing Generalization (Selkirk 1982) and Net Auditory Distance (Dziubalska-Kołaczyk 2009, 2014), as well as corpus frequency of the examined sequences. For example, a number of languages allows glide-plus vowel sylllables but disallow the specific sequences ji, wu. Using a five-point scale, 50 Polish students were requested to make acceptability judgements of 80 monosyllabic nonwords with either initial or final sequences of double consonants which follow the phonotactic restrictions of Polish. Sonority accounts for the bulk of sequencing generalizations across languages, but there are many facts that don't at least in any natural and obvious way fall under the penumbra of sonority. ).This chapter presents the first study devoted to Polish native speakers’ phonotactic intuitions concerning the well-formedness of nonwords with two-consonant clusters. Proceedings of the 28 th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. Acquisition of /s/-initial clusters: a parametric approach. For a different analysis of initial /s/ clusters, via government phonology, see Pan and Snyder ( 2004 Pan, N., & Snyder, W. Affricates, which are also missing in the table, can be placed between stops and fricatives.Ĥ. They can be given the same sonority values with the high vowels because they are the non-syllabic versions of the latter. Although glides are not included in the hierarchy, their place in the order is rather predictable. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society. 2: The Parasession on the Syllable in Phonetics and Phonology (pp. Deaton (Eds.), Papers from the 26 th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Vol. Local computational networks and the distribution of segments in the Spanish syllable. An introduction to natural generative phonology. Yet, there are others who treat these two groups of sounds equal in sonority index (Venneman, 1972 Venneman, T. PhD Dissertation, University of Massachusetts. Oehrle (Eds.), Language sound structure: studies in phonology presented to Morris Halle by his teacher and students (pp. On the major class features and syllable theory. ), while others rank voiceless fricatives higher (Selkirk, 1984 Selkirk, E. Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 22, 1– 20 (Rutgers Optimality Archive. ![]() however, sequences of consonants that violate this generalization. Some consider voiced stops more sonorous (Jespersen, 1904 Jespersen, O. what is known as the sonority sequencing generalization (shown in Figure 6) which. It should be pointed out, however, that a dispute exists with respect to the relative order of voiced stops and voiceless fricatives. The SSP states that the center of a syllable, namely the syllable nucleus, often a vowel, constitutes a sonority peak that is preceded and/or followed by a sequence of segments-consonants-with progressively decreasing sonority values (i.e., the sonority has to fall toward both edges of the syllable). For a complete list, see Parker ( 2002 Parker, F.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |